--- title: "Healthchecks.io Alternative with Uptime & SSL Monitoring Built In | FourSight" description: "Healthchecks.io's free tier (20 checks) is genuinely generous. But it only watches cron jobs. FourSight bundles heartbeat monitoring with uptime, SSL, DNS, domain expiry, and status pages from $16–40/mo — one tool for the whole surface." lang: en json-ld: | [ { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [ { "@type": "Question", "name": "Isn't Healthchecks.io's free tier better than FourSight's?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "For pure cron monitoring, yes — 20 free checks vs zero (FourSight heartbeats unlock on the $40 Growth plan). If cron jobs are all you monitor and free is the requirement, Healthchecks.io is the honest recommendation. FourSight wins when you also need uptime, SSL, DNS, or a status page and want one tool instead of two." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Can FourSight replace a self-hosted Healthchecks instance?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Functionally yes for the heartbeat core — schedules, grace periods, alerting. You lose self-hosting; you gain hosted infrastructure, active uptime/SSL/DNS checks, escalation policies, and status pages. If self-hosting is a compliance requirement, keep Healthchecks for internal jobs and use FourSight for the public-facing surface." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How do I migrate from Healthchecks.io?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Create matching heartbeat monitors in FourSight (schedule + grace period), then swap the ping URLs in your crontabs, systemd timers, or CI configs. There's no importer, but each monitor takes under a minute — most teams re-create 20 checks in under 15 minutes." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Healthchecks.io is open source. Is FourSight?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "No — FourSight is a hosted commercial service. If self-hosting the monitor is a hard requirement, Healthchecks.io (self-hosted) or Uptime Kuma are the right tools; some teams run one of those internally and use FourSight as the external multi-region watchdog." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Does FourSight support the same ping patterns (start/fail signals)?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "FourSight heartbeats cover the core dead-man's-switch pattern: expected schedule, grace period, alert on miss. Healthchecks.io's richer signal set (start pings, fail pings, run-duration measurement) is deeper — if you rely on those, weigh that against the consolidation benefit." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Why are FourSight heartbeats only on Growth?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Heartbeats ship in the plan built for teams running production workloads, alongside all 8 check types, escalations, and multi-user orgs. We'd rather be upfront: if you only need a handful of free cron checks, Healthchecks.io serves that better today." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Can I keep Healthchecks.io for internal jobs and still use FourSight?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Absolutely — plenty of teams keep free Healthchecks.io checks on low-stakes internal scripts and put revenue-critical jobs, uptime, SSL, and status pages on FourSight. The tools don't conflict." } } ] }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://foursight.cloud" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Compare", "item": "https://foursight.cloud/compare" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "vs Healthchecks.io", "item": "https://foursight.cloud/compare/healthchecks-alternative" } ] } ] --- [FourSight ](/) [Features](/#features)[Pricing](/pricing)[Guides](/guides)[Glossary](/glossary)[FAQ](/faq) [Login](/auth)[Start free](/auth?signup=true) [Start free](/auth?signup=true) FourSight vs Healthchecks.io # Looking for a Healthchecks.io alternative ? Keep the dead-man's-switch simplicity — add real uptime, SSL, DNS, and status pages in the same tool. FourSight is a Healthchecks.io alternative for teams that need active monitoring too: Healthchecks.io only listens for pings (and its free 20-check tier is genuinely generous), while FourSight combines heartbeat/cron monitors with multi-region uptime, SSL, DNS, and hosted status pages — one tool from $16–40/mo instead of two. [Add uptime to your cron monitoring](/auth?signup=true) [View pricing](/pricing) Why switch? ## FourSight vs Healthchecks.io: the breakdown Healthchecks.io is one of the most respected tools in the cron-monitoring niche: a dead-simple ping-URL model, a free tier with 20 checks that covers most personal and small-team needs, open-source code you can self-host, and an unusually broad set of notification integrations (Slack, Matrix, ntfy, Signal, and dozens more). Paid plans start at $20/mo for 100 checks (as published July 2026 — verify with the vendor). Its design philosophy is also its boundary: Healthchecks.io is deliberately passive. It waits for your systems to ping it. It cannot probe a URL, check an SSL certificate's expiry, watch a DNS record for drift, or host a customer-facing status page. Every team we've seen run it in production pairs it with a second, active monitoring tool. FourSight covers both halves in one product: [heartbeat monitors](/features/cron-job-monitoring) (the same ping-URL pattern, with 5-field cron expressions and [grace periods](/glossary/grace-period)) plus active multi-region monitoring — HTTP, [SSL](/features/ssl-monitoring), [DNS](/features/dns-monitoring), domain expiry, keyword, ping, and port checks validated by 4-region [quorum consensus](/glossary/quorum-monitoring) — feeding one incident pipeline with escalation policies and hosted [status pages](/features/status-pages). (Tier-by-tier math is on the [Healthchecks.io pricing comparison](/compare/healthchecks-pricing).) The honest concessions: Healthchecks.io's free tier beats anything FourSight offers for pure cron work, its open-source self-hosting option matters for some compliance postures, and its integration list is longer. The FourSight case is consolidation, not beating Healthchecks.io at its own specialty. Advantages ## Why teams choose FourSight over Healthchecks.io ### Active + passive monitoring in one place Healthchecks.io only listens for pings. FourSight combines heartbeat monitors (passive) with HTTP, SSL, DNS, domain, keyword, ping, and port checks (active, 4-region quorum) in one monitor list. ### Customer-facing status pages Healthchecks.io has no public status pages. Every FourSight plan includes at least one hosted status page, up to 25 white-label pages on Scale. ### Escalations and incident timelines FourSight opens structured incidents with severity levels and event timelines, and escalates through your team on Growth+ — beyond simple per-check notifications. ### One bill for the whole monitoring surface Instead of Healthchecks.io plus a separate uptime product, FourSight Growth ($40/mo) covers heartbeats, 100 uptime monitors, all 8 check types, and 5 status pages. Pricing ## Pricing: FourSight vs Healthchecks.io Healthchecks.io wins the free-tier comparison outright — the math changes when you price the full monitoring surface. Scenario FourSight Healthchecks.io Cron monitoring only, up to 20 checks No free heartbeats — Growth ($40/mo) is where they unlock. For this scenario, Healthchecks.io is simply the better deal. Free — 20 checks, generous limits, open-source. The category's best free heartbeat tier. Cron + uptime + SSL + a status page Growth — $40/mo total: heartbeats, 100 multi-region uptime monitors, SSL/DNS/domain checks, 5 status pages, escalations. Healthchecks.io Business ($20/mo, 100 checks) + a separate uptime/status-page tool ($15–30/mo) = ~$35–50/mo across two systems. Uptime now, cron later Free (10 monitors) or Starter ($16/mo, 50 monitors) today; add heartbeats by upgrading to Growth when needed. Healthchecks.io can't cover the uptime half at any price — it's passive by design. Healthchecks.io figures as published July 2026 — verify with the vendor. FourSight prices are from our public pricing page (annual billing ≈ 25% discount). Healthchecks.io Free: 20 checks — genuinely the most generous free heartbeat tier in the category (as published July 2026 — verify with the vendor). FourSight's Free plan covers 10 monitors but is uptime/ping only; heartbeats unlock on Growth. Healthchecks.io Business ($20/mo, as published July 2026): 100 checks — still cron-only. You'd add a second tool for uptime, SSL, and status pages. FourSight Growth ($40/mo): heartbeat/cron monitoring plus 100 monitors across all 8 check types, 30-second intervals, escalation policies, and 5 status pages — one tool replacing two. Full FourSight plan details are on the [pricing page](/pricing) — five flat tiers, annual billing ≈ 25% off, no per-monitor surprise fees. Want the cost-only deep dive? See the [Healthchecks.io pricing comparison](/compare/healthchecks-pricing). Feature comparison ## Side-by-side comparison Feature FourSight Healthchecks.io Cron & Heartbeat Ping-URL heartbeat checks Growth+ Cron-expression schedules Growth+ (5-field cron) Grace periods Growth+ Free heartbeat checks 20 free\* Open source / self-hostable Active Monitoring HTTP uptime probing SSL certificate expiry Growth+ DNS drift detection Growth+ Domain expiry tracking (RDAP) Growth+ Keyword / content checks Growth+ Port monitoring Growth+ Multi-region quorum consensus Alerting & Ops Email / Slack / webhook alerts Starter+ Many niche integrations (Matrix, ntfy…) SMS alerts included Pro+ Credits Escalation policies Growth+ Incident management with timelines Starter+ Hosted public status pages Every plan Pricing Free tier 10 monitors (uptime/ping) 20 checks (cron)\* Paid entry $16/mo (50 monitors) $20/mo (100 checks)\* Cron + uptime + SSL + status pages $40/mo (Growth, all-in) Healthchecks + second tool \* Healthchecks.io figures as published July 2026 — verify current plans, prices, and policies with the vendor. FourSight figures reflect our current published plans. Honest take ## Who should choose which Comparison pages usually pretend the writer's tool wins every scenario. Here's the fair version — when FourSight is the right call, and when Healthchecks.io still is. ### Choose FourSight if… FourSight is the better fit when cron checks are half the requirement, not all of it. - You're running Healthchecks.io plus a separate uptime tool and want one monitor list, one incident pipeline, one bill. - You need a public status page — Healthchecks.io doesn't offer one. - You want cron-miss alerts to escalate through the same policies as your uptime incidents. - You need active SSL, DNS, or domain-expiry coverage no passive tool can provide. ### Choose Healthchecks.io if… Healthchecks.io is the honest recommendation in these cases. - You need free cron monitoring: 20 free checks beats FourSight, where heartbeats require the $40 Growth plan. - Self-hosting the monitor is a compliance or philosophy requirement — Healthchecks.io is open source; FourSight is hosted only. - You alert through niche channels (Matrix, ntfy, Signal, etc.) that FourSight's Email/Slack/Webhook/SMS set doesn't cover natively. - Scheduled jobs are genuinely all you monitor. Migration ## How to migrate from Healthchecks.io to FourSight Heartbeat migration is a URL swap: create the monitor, replace the ping URL in your jobs, deploy. No importer exists — each monitor is re-created manually in under a minute, and most teams re-create 20 checks in under 15 minutes. Estimated time: 15–30 minutes for a typical setup 1. 1 ### Export your check list Healthchecks.io's API (or dashboard) gives you every check's name, schedule or period, and grace time. That's the full spec to carry over. 2. 2 ### Sign up and pick Growth Heartbeats unlock on Growth ($40/mo). If you want to feel the platform out first, start Free and migrate your uptime checks — then upgrade when you're ready to move the cron side. 3. 3 ### Create matching heartbeat monitors Recreate each check with the same schedule (5-field cron expression) and grace period. FourSight issues a unique ping URL per monitor. 4. 4 ### Swap ping URLs in your jobs Replace hc-ping.com calls in crontabs, systemd timers, Kubernetes CronJobs, and CI configs with the FourSight heartbeat URLs. Deploy and watch the first pings arrive. 5. 5 ### Add the active half and consolidate Create HTTP/SSL/DNS monitors for the surfaces Healthchecks.io couldn't see, attach a status page, and retire the second uptime tool (or the Healthchecks.io subscription) once the parallel run is clean. [Add uptime to your cron monitoring](/auth?signup=true) No credit card. No import tool needed — monitors are just URLs plus a check type. FAQ ## Common questions #### Isn't Healthchecks.io's free tier better than FourSight's? For pure cron monitoring, yes — 20 free checks vs zero (FourSight heartbeats unlock on the $40 Growth plan). If cron jobs are all you monitor and free is the requirement, Healthchecks.io is the honest recommendation. FourSight wins when you also need uptime, SSL, DNS, or a status page and want one tool instead of two. #### Can FourSight replace a self-hosted Healthchecks instance? Functionally yes for the heartbeat core — schedules, grace periods, alerting. You lose self-hosting; you gain hosted infrastructure, active uptime/SSL/DNS checks, escalation policies, and status pages. If self-hosting is a compliance requirement, keep Healthchecks for internal jobs and use FourSight for the public-facing surface. #### How do I migrate from Healthchecks.io? Create matching heartbeat monitors in FourSight (schedule + grace period), then swap the ping URLs in your crontabs, systemd timers, or CI configs. There's no importer, but each monitor takes under a minute — most teams re-create 20 checks in under 15 minutes. #### Healthchecks.io is open source. Is FourSight? No — FourSight is a hosted commercial service. If self-hosting the monitor is a hard requirement, Healthchecks.io (self-hosted) or Uptime Kuma are the right tools; some teams run one of those internally and use FourSight as the external multi-region watchdog. #### Does FourSight support the same ping patterns (start/fail signals)? FourSight heartbeats cover the core dead-man's-switch pattern: expected schedule, grace period, alert on miss. Healthchecks.io's richer signal set (start pings, fail pings, run-duration measurement) is deeper — if you rely on those, weigh that against the consolidation benefit. #### Why are FourSight heartbeats only on Growth? Heartbeats ship in the plan built for teams running production workloads, alongside all 8 check types, escalations, and multi-user orgs. We'd rather be upfront: if you only need a handful of free cron checks, Healthchecks.io serves that better today. #### Can I keep Healthchecks.io for internal jobs and still use FourSight? Absolutely — plenty of teams keep free Healthchecks.io checks on low-stakes internal scripts and put revenue-critical jobs, uptime, SSL, and status pages on FourSight. The tools don't conflict. Learn more ## Related monitoring guides [ #### Heartbeat Monitoring for Cron Jobs & Scheduled Tasks Ensure your cron jobs, background workers, and scheduled tasks run on time — get alerted the moment a job goes silent. 11 min read ](/guides/heartbeat-monitoring-cron-jobs)[ #### Heartbeat Monitoring for Webhooks & ETL Pipelines Track recurring webhook deliveries and ETL pipeline runs so silent data-flow failures never go unnoticed. 7 min read ](/guides/heartbeat-monitoring-webhooks-etl)[ #### Monitoring PowerShell & Bash Scripts with Heartbeats Add a single curl line to any script and know instantly when it fails, hangs, or finishes late. 6 min read ](/guides/monitoring-powershell-scripts)[ #### How to Monitor SaaS Revenue-Critical Endpoints Identify and protect the API routes and pages that directly impact your MRR — from signup flows to billing webhooks. 8 min read ](/guides/monitoring-saas-revenue-endpoints) More comparisons ## See how FourSight compares to others [vs UptimeRobot](/compare/uptimerobot-alternative)[vs StatusCake](/compare/statuscake-alternative)[vs Freshping](/compare/freshping-alternative)[vs Pingdom](/compare/pingdom-alternative)[vs Pulsetic](/compare/pulsetic-alternative)[vs Better Stack](/compare/better-stack-alternative)[vs Uptime Kuma](/compare/uptime-kuma-alternative)[vs Cronitor](/compare/cronitor-alternative)[vs Hyperping](/compare/hyperping-alternative) Further reading ## References & Healthchecks.io reviews First-party docs and independent directories so you can verify the comparison above. - Healthchecks.io [Official site & pricing](https://healthchecks.io/) - GitHub [healthchecks/healthchecks repository](https://github.com/healthchecks/healthchecks) - G2 [Healthchecks.io reviews](https://www.g2.com/products/healthchecks-io/reviews) - G2 [Website Monitoring Software category](https://www.g2.com/categories/website-monitoring) The verdict Healthchecks.io is the best free cron monitor available, full stop. FourSight is what you graduate to when the job list grows into a monitoring surface — heartbeats plus multi-region uptime, SSL, DNS, and customer-facing status pages, consolidated into one flat $40 plan instead of a toolchain. ## Ready to switch from Healthchecks.io? No credit card required. 10 free monitors. Multi-region consensus from day one. [Add uptime to your cron monitoring](/auth?signup=true) [View pricing](/pricing) FourSight © 2026 [TetraCore](https://tetracorehq.com/). All rights reserved. FourSight is a TetraCore product — Bowling Green, Ohio. Product [Pricing](/pricing)[Guides](/guides)[Glossary](/glossary)[FAQ](/faq)[About](/about)[For Agencies](/solutions/agencies)[For Startups](/solutions/startups)[Privacy](/privacy)[Terms](/terms) Features [Cron Job & Heartbeat Monitoring](/features/cron-job-monitoring)[SSL Certificate Monitoring](/features/ssl-monitoring)[Status Pages](/features/status-pages)[Domain Expiry Monitoring](/features/domain-expiry-monitoring)[DNS Monitoring](/features/dns-monitoring)[Port Monitoring](/features/port-monitoring) Compare [All comparisons](/compare)[vs UptimeRobot](/compare/uptimerobot-alternative)[vs StatusCake](/compare/statuscake-alternative)[vs Freshping](/compare/freshping-alternative)[vs Pingdom](/compare/pingdom-alternative)[vs Pulsetic](/compare/pulsetic-alternative)[vs Better Stack](/compare/better-stack-alternative)[vs Uptime Kuma](/compare/uptime-kuma-alternative)[vs Cronitor](/compare/cronitor-alternative)[vs Healthchecks.io](/compare/healthchecks-alternative)[vs Hyperping](/compare/hyperping-alternative) Pricing Guides [UptimeRobot Pricing](/compare/uptimerobot-pricing)[StatusCake Pricing](/compare/statuscake-pricing)[Pingdom Pricing](/compare/pingdom-pricing)[Better Stack Pricing](/compare/better-stack-pricing)[Uptime Kuma Pricing](/compare/uptime-kuma-pricing)[Cronitor Pricing](/compare/cronitor-pricing)[Healthchecks.io Pricing](/compare/healthchecks-pricing)[Hyperping Pricing](/compare/hyperping-pricing)[Pulsetic Pricing](/compare/pulsetic-pricing) 0/mo, as published July 2026): 100 checks — still cron-only. You'd add a second tool for uptime, SSL, and status pages. FourSight Growth ($40/mo): heartbeat/cron monitoring plus 100 monitors across all 8 check types, 30-second intervals, escalation policies, and 5 status pages — one tool replacing two. ## Who should choose FourSight? FourSight is the better fit when cron checks are half the requirement, not all of it. - You're running Healthchecks.io plus a separate uptime tool and want one monitor list, one incident pipeline, one bill. - You need a public status page — Healthchecks.io doesn't offer one. - You want cron-miss alerts to escalate through the same policies as your uptime incidents. - You need active SSL, DNS, or domain-expiry coverage no passive tool can provide. ## Who should choose Healthchecks.io? Healthchecks.io is the honest recommendation in these cases. - You need free cron monitoring: 20 free checks beats FourSight, where heartbeats require the $40 Growth plan. - Self-hosting the monitor is a compliance or philosophy requirement — Healthchecks.io is open source; FourSight is hosted only. - You alert through niche channels (Matrix, ntfy, Signal, etc.) that FourSight's Email/Slack/Webhook/SMS set doesn't cover natively. - Scheduled jobs are genuinely all you monitor. ## How to migrate from Healthchecks.io to FourSight Heartbeat migration is a URL swap: create the monitor, replace the ping URL in your jobs, deploy. No importer exists — each monitor is re-created manually in under a minute, and most teams re-create 20 checks in under 15 minutes. Step 1 — 1. Export your check list: Healthchecks.io's API (or dashboard) gives you every check's name, schedule or period, and grace time. That's the full spec to carry over. Step 2 — 2. Sign up and pick Growth: Heartbeats unlock on Growth ($40/mo). If you want to feel the platform out first, start Free and migrate your uptime checks — then upgrade when you're ready to move the cron side. Step 3 — 3. Create matching heartbeat monitors: Recreate each check with the same schedule (5-field cron expression) and grace period. FourSight issues a unique ping URL per monitor. Step 4 — 4. Swap ping URLs in your jobs: Replace hc-ping.com calls in crontabs, systemd timers, Kubernetes CronJobs, and CI configs with the FourSight heartbeat URLs. Deploy and watch the first pings arrive. Step 5 — 5. Add the active half and consolidate: Create HTTP/SSL/DNS monitors for the surfaces Healthchecks.io couldn't see, attach a status page, and retire the second uptime tool (or the Healthchecks.io subscription) once the parallel run is clean. Estimated time: 15–30 minutes for a typical setup ## Our verdict Healthchecks.io is the best free cron monitor available, full stop. FourSight is what you graduate to when the job list grows into a monitoring surface — heartbeats plus multi-region uptime, SSL, DNS, and customer-facing status pages, consolidated into one flat $40 plan instead of a toolchain. ## Further reading Healthchecks.io — Official site & pricing (https://healthchecks.io/) GitHub — healthchecks/healthchecks repository (https://github.com/healthchecks/healthchecks) G2 — Healthchecks.io reviews (https://www.g2.com/products/healthchecks-io/reviews) G2 — Website Monitoring Software category (https://www.g2.com/categories/website-monitoring) ## Feature comparison: FourSight vs Healthchecks.io Feature FourSight Healthchecks.io Ping-URL heartbeat checks Growth+ Yes Cron-expression schedules Growth+ (5-field cron) Yes Grace periods Growth+ Yes Free heartbeat checks No 20 free\* Open source / self-hostable No Yes HTTP uptime probing Yes No SSL certificate expiry Growth+ No DNS drift detection Growth+ No Domain expiry tracking (RDAP) Growth+ No Keyword / content checks Growth+ No Port monitoring Growth+ No Multi-region quorum consensus Yes No Email / Slack / webhook alerts Starter+ Yes Many niche integrations (Matrix, ntfy…) No Yes SMS alerts included Pro+ Credits Escalation policies Growth+ No Incident management with timelines Starter+ No Hosted public status pages Every plan No Free tier 10 monitors (uptime/ping) 20 checks (cron)\* Paid entry 6/mo (50 monitors) 0/mo (100 checks)\* Cron + uptime + SSL + status pages $40/mo (Growth, all-in) Healthchecks + second tool ## Price math by scenario Scenario FourSight Healthchecks.io Cron monitoring only, up to 20 checks No free heartbeats — Growth ($40/mo) is where they unlock. For this scenario, Healthchecks.io is simply the better deal. Free — 20 checks, generous limits, open-source. The category's best free heartbeat tier. Cron + uptime + SSL + a status page Growth — $40/mo total: heartbeats, 100 multi-region uptime monitors, SSL/DNS/domain checks, 5 status pages, escalations. Healthchecks.io Business (0/mo, 100 checks) + a separate uptime/status-page tool ( 5–30/mo) = ~$35–50/mo across two systems. Uptime now, cron later Free (10 monitors) or Starter ( 6/mo, 50 monitors) today; add heartbeats by upgrading to Growth when needed. Healthchecks.io can't cover the uptime half at any price — it's passive by design. ## Frequently asked questions ### Isn't Healthchecks.io's free tier better than FourSight's? For pure cron monitoring, yes — 20 free checks vs zero (FourSight heartbeats unlock on the $40 Growth plan). If cron jobs are all you monitor and free is the requirement, Healthchecks.io is the honest recommendation. FourSight wins when you also need uptime, SSL, DNS, or a status page and want one tool instead of two. ### Can FourSight replace a self-hosted Healthchecks instance? Functionally yes for the heartbeat core — schedules, grace periods, alerting. You lose self-hosting; you gain hosted infrastructure, active uptime/SSL/DNS checks, escalation policies, and status pages. If self-hosting is a compliance requirement, keep Healthchecks for internal jobs and use FourSight for the public-facing surface. ### How do I migrate from Healthchecks.io? Create matching heartbeat monitors in FourSight (schedule + grace period), then swap the ping URLs in your crontabs, systemd timers, or CI configs. There's no importer, but each monitor takes under a minute — most teams re-create 20 checks in under 15 minutes. ### Healthchecks.io is open source. Is FourSight? No — FourSight is a hosted commercial service. If self-hosting the monitor is a hard requirement, Healthchecks.io (self-hosted) or Uptime Kuma are the right tools; some teams run one of those internally and use FourSight as the external multi-region watchdog. ### Does FourSight support the same ping patterns (start/fail signals)? FourSight heartbeats cover the core dead-man's-switch pattern: expected schedule, grace period, alert on miss. Healthchecks.io's richer signal set (start pings, fail pings, run-duration measurement) is deeper — if you rely on those, weigh that against the consolidation benefit. ### Why are FourSight heartbeats only on Growth? Heartbeats ship in the plan built for teams running production workloads, alongside all 8 check types, escalations, and multi-user orgs. We'd rather be upfront: if you only need a handful of free cron checks, Healthchecks.io serves that better today. ### Can I keep Healthchecks.io for internal jobs and still use FourSight? Absolutely — plenty of teams keep free Healthchecks.io checks on low-stakes internal scripts and put revenue-critical jobs, uptime, SSL, and status pages on FourSight. The tools don't conflict. ## More comparisons - [FourSight vs UptimeRobot](/compare/uptimerobot-alternative) - [FourSight vs StatusCake](/compare/statuscake-alternative) - [FourSight vs Freshping](/compare/freshping-alternative) - [FourSight vs Pingdom](/compare/pingdom-alternative) - [FourSight vs Pulsetic](/compare/pulsetic-alternative) - [FourSight vs Better Stack](/compare/better-stack-alternative) - [FourSight vs Uptime Kuma](/compare/uptime-kuma-alternative) - [FourSight vs Cronitor](/compare/cronitor-alternative) - [FourSight vs Hyperping](/compare/hyperping-alternative) - [All FourSight comparisons](/compare) - [FourSight pricing](/pricing) ## Explore FourSight - [FourSight home](/) - [Pricing](/pricing) - [FAQ](/faq) - [Monitoring guides](/guides) - [Monitoring glossary](/glossary) - [Compare FourSight](/compare) - [Monitoring for agencies](/solutions/agencies) - [Monitoring for startups](/solutions/startups) - [Migrate from UptimeRobot](/migrate/uptimerobot) - [Migrate from Freshping](/migrate/freshping) - [About FourSight](/about) - [Privacy policy](/privacy) - [Terms of service](/terms) - [Start monitoring free](/auth?signup=true) - [Cron Job & Heartbeat Monitoring](/features/cron-job-monitoring) - [SSL Certificate Monitoring](/features/ssl-monitoring) - [Status Pages](/features/status-pages) - [Domain Expiry Monitoring](/features/domain-expiry-monitoring) - [DNS Monitoring](/features/dns-monitoring) - [Port Monitoring](/features/port-monitoring) - [FourSight vs UptimeRobot](/compare/uptimerobot-alternative) - [FourSight vs StatusCake](/compare/statuscake-alternative) - [FourSight vs Freshping](/compare/freshping-alternative) - [FourSight vs Pingdom](/compare/pingdom-alternative) - [FourSight vs Pulsetic](/compare/pulsetic-alternative) - [FourSight vs Better Stack](/compare/better-stack-alternative) - [FourSight vs Uptime Kuma](/compare/uptime-kuma-alternative) - [FourSight vs Cronitor](/compare/cronitor-alternative) - [FourSight vs Hyperping](/compare/hyperping-alternative) - [UptimeRobot pricing](/compare/uptimerobot-pricing) - [StatusCake pricing](/compare/statuscake-pricing) - [Pingdom pricing](/compare/pingdom-pricing) - [Better Stack pricing](/compare/better-stack-pricing) - [Uptime Kuma pricing](/compare/uptime-kuma-pricing) - [Cronitor pricing](/compare/cronitor-pricing) - [Healthchecks.io pricing](/compare/healthchecks-pricing) - [Hyperping pricing](/compare/hyperping-pricing) - [Pulsetic pricing](/compare/pulsetic-pricing) [A TetraCore product](https://tetracorehq.com/)