--- title: "Hyperping Pricing (2026): $24–249 Tiers vs $16–160 Flat | FourSight" description: "Hyperping: free for 20 monitors, Essentials $24/mo (50 monitors), Pro $74/mo (100), Business $249/mo (1,000) — as published July 2026, verify with the vendor. FourSight: $16/mo for 50, $40/mo for 100, $160/mo for 500+. Tier-by-tier price math inside." lang: en json-ld: | [ { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [ { "@type": "Question", "name": "How much does Hyperping cost?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "As published on hyperping.com/pricing in July 2026 (verify with the vendor): Free for 20 monitors, Essentials $24/mo for 50 monitors, Pro $74/mo for 100, Business $249/mo for 1,000, all billed yearly with 2 months free on annual plans. Enterprise is custom." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Is FourSight cheaper than Hyperping?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "At every published paid tier we compared in July 2026, yes: $16 vs $24 at 50 monitors and $40 vs $74 at 100. The one place Hyperping wins on price is the free tier — 20 monitors vs 10 — and possibly at ~1,000 monitors, where its Business plan has more headroom. Verify current figures with the vendor." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What justifies Hyperping's higher paid tiers?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Genuine strengths: polished status pages, a clean UI, and a bigger free tier. Whether that's worth ~50–85% more per month than FourSight's equivalent tiers depends on how much you value design polish versus check-type depth and quorum consensus — the scenario table above gives you the raw numbers." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Do both include heartbeat/cron monitoring?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes. Hyperping includes heartbeat checks; FourSight heartbeats (Growth, $40/mo) support 5-field cron expressions with grace periods and miss thresholds, feeding the same escalation policies as uptime incidents." } } ] }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://foursight.cloud" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Compare", "item": "https://foursight.cloud/compare" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Hyperping Pricing", "item": "https://foursight.cloud/compare/hyperping-pricing" } ] } ] --- [FourSight ](/) [Features](/#features)[Pricing](/pricing)[Guides](/guides)[Glossary](/glossary)[FAQ](/faq) [Login](/auth)[Start free](/auth?signup=true) [Start free](/auth?signup=true) Hyperping Pricing Comparison # Hyperping Pricing, Tier by Tier: $24 vs $16 at 50 monitors, $74 vs $40 at 100 Hyperping's published ladder (July 2026 — verify with the vendor): free for 20 monitors, Essentials at $24/mo for 50, Pro at $74/mo for 100, Business at $249/mo for 1,000. FourSight's ladder: free for 10, $16/mo for 50, $40/mo for 100, $160/mo for 500+. Hyperping's free tier is bigger; every paid rung is cheaper on FourSight. 33% less at 50 monitors ~46% less at 100 monitors All 8 check types on Growth [See FourSight Pricing](/pricing) [Compare Scenarios](#price-scenarios) Looking for the feature-by-feature comparison instead? See [FourSight vs Hyperping](/compare/hyperping-alternative). The pricing model ## How Hyperping prices Hyperping prices by monitor count in clean flat tiers — the same philosophy FourSight uses, which makes this the rare comparison you can do almost entirely with arithmetic. As published July 2026 (verify with the vendor): Free covers 20 monitors; Essentials is $24/mo (billed yearly) for 50 monitors; Pro is $74/mo for 100; Business is $249/mo for 1,000; Enterprise is custom. Annual billing gives two months free. Credit where due: a 20-monitor free tier is twice FourSight's, and Hyperping's status pages and UI polish are genuinely excellent. The gap is on the paid rungs and in check-type depth — FourSight's Growth tier adds DNS drift detection, RDAP-based domain expiry, and port send-expect checks that Hyperping doesn't go as deep on, at roughly half Pro's price. FourSight's ladder at the same monitor counts: Starter $16/mo for 50 monitors (1-minute checks), Growth $40/mo for 100 (30-second checks, all 8 check types, escalation policies), Pro $80/mo for 250 with SMS included, Scale $160/mo for 500+ with white-label status pages. Annual billing is ≈25% off. Price math, July 2026 ## The same shopping list, priced both ways Scenario FourSight Hyperping Free tier Free — 10 monitors 4-region quorum consensus on every check, email alerts, 1 status page, commercial use allowed. Free — 20 monitors Twice the monitor count (July 2026 — verify with the vendor). Honest point to Hyperping. 50 monitors Starter — $16/mo 1-minute intervals, Slack + HMAC webhooks, maintenance windows, 2 status pages. Essentials — $24/mo Billed yearly (July 2026). Same monitor count, 50% more per month. 100 monitors Growth — $40/mo 30-second intervals, all 8 check types incl. DNS drift, domain expiry & heartbeats, escalation policies, 5 status pages. Pro — $74/mo Roughly 85% more at the same count (July 2026 — verify with the vendor). Large fleets / agencies Scale — $160/mo, 500+ monitors 15-second intervals, 25 white-label status pages, SLA guarantee. Business — $249/mo, 1,000 monitors More monitor headroom for more money — if you genuinely run ~1,000 monitors, price both and compare per-monitor cost. Hyperping figures from hyperping.com/pricing as published July 2026 — verify with the vendor; annual billing there gives 2 months free. FourSight prices are from our public pricing page (annual billing ≈ 25% off). Full FourSight plan details are on the [pricing page](/pricing). Honest take ## Which pricing wins, where Pricing pages usually pretend the writer's tool is cheaper in every scenario. Here's the fair version — where Hyperping's pricing is genuinely the better deal, and where FourSight's is. ### Where Hyperping wins Where Hyperping's pricing genuinely wins: - The free tier: 20 monitors vs FourSight's 10 — for small setups that never intend to pay, Hyperping covers more at $0. - Very large fleets: Business includes 1,000 monitors, more headroom than Scale's 500+ baseline (compare per-monitor cost at your actual count). - Status-page polish and overall design, if presentation is a top-three criterion for your team. ### Where FourSight wins Where FourSight's ladder wins: - Every paid rung up to 500 monitors: $16 vs $24 at 50, $40 vs $74 at 100, $80 (250 monitors, SMS included) vs $74 (100 monitors). - Check-type depth at the mid tier: DNS drift, RDAP domain expiry, and port send-expect checks ship in Growth. - Quorum-based consensus on every plan — including Free — rather than multi-location checking alone. - Escalation policies at $40/mo instead of a higher tier. FAQ ## Hyperping pricing questions #### How much does Hyperping cost? As published on hyperping.com/pricing in July 2026 (verify with the vendor): Free for 20 monitors, Essentials $24/mo for 50 monitors, Pro $74/mo for 100, Business $249/mo for 1,000, all billed yearly with 2 months free on annual plans. Enterprise is custom. #### Is FourSight cheaper than Hyperping? At every published paid tier we compared in July 2026, yes: $16 vs $24 at 50 monitors and $40 vs $74 at 100. The one place Hyperping wins on price is the free tier — 20 monitors vs 10 — and possibly at ~1,000 monitors, where its Business plan has more headroom. Verify current figures with the vendor. #### What justifies Hyperping's higher paid tiers? Genuine strengths: polished status pages, a clean UI, and a bigger free tier. Whether that's worth ~50–85% more per month than FourSight's equivalent tiers depends on how much you value design polish versus check-type depth and quorum consensus — the scenario table above gives you the raw numbers. #### Do both include heartbeat/cron monitoring? Yes. Hyperping includes heartbeat checks; FourSight heartbeats (Growth, $40/mo) support 5-field cron expressions with grace periods and miss thresholds, feeding the same escalation policies as uptime incidents. Go deeper ## Related features & guides [ #### DNS monitoring Drift detection for the records attackers and typos both love to change. ](/features/dns-monitoring)[ #### Domain expiry monitoring RDAP-based expiry tracking — a Growth-tier check Hyperping doesn't go deep on. ](/features/domain-expiry-monitoring)[ #### Quorum monitoring What consensus adds over plain multi-location checks. ](/glossary/quorum-monitoring) More price math ## Other pricing comparisons [UptimeRobot pricing](/compare/uptimerobot-pricing)[StatusCake pricing](/compare/statuscake-pricing)[Pingdom pricing](/compare/pingdom-pricing)[Better Stack pricing](/compare/better-stack-pricing)[Uptime Kuma pricing](/compare/uptime-kuma-pricing)[Cronitor pricing](/compare/cronitor-pricing)[Healthchecks.io pricing](/compare/healthchecks-pricing)[Pulsetic pricing](/compare/pulsetic-pricing) Or read the full [FourSight vs Hyperping comparison](/compare/hyperping-alternative) — features, migration steps, and when Hyperping is the better choice. ## Run the numbers on your own monitors Start on the Free plan — 10 monitors, 4-region quorum consensus, commercial use allowed. No credit card. [Start monitoring free](/auth?signup=true) [View pricing](/pricing) FourSight © 2026 [TetraCore](https://tetracorehq.com/). All rights reserved. FourSight is a TetraCore product — Bowling Green, Ohio. Product [Pricing](/pricing)[Guides](/guides)[Glossary](/glossary)[FAQ](/faq)[About](/about)[For Agencies](/solutions/agencies)[For Startups](/solutions/startups)[Privacy](/privacy)[Terms](/terms) Features [Cron Job & Heartbeat Monitoring](/features/cron-job-monitoring)[SSL Certificate Monitoring](/features/ssl-monitoring)[Status Pages](/features/status-pages)[Domain Expiry Monitoring](/features/domain-expiry-monitoring)[DNS Monitoring](/features/dns-monitoring)[Port Monitoring](/features/port-monitoring) Compare [All comparisons](/compare)[vs UptimeRobot](/compare/uptimerobot-alternative)[vs StatusCake](/compare/statuscake-alternative)[vs Freshping](/compare/freshping-alternative)[vs Pingdom](/compare/pingdom-alternative)[vs Pulsetic](/compare/pulsetic-alternative)[vs Better Stack](/compare/better-stack-alternative)[vs Uptime Kuma](/compare/uptime-kuma-alternative)[vs Cronitor](/compare/cronitor-alternative)[vs Healthchecks.io](/compare/healthchecks-alternative)[vs Hyperping](/compare/hyperping-alternative) Pricing Guides [UptimeRobot Pricing](/compare/uptimerobot-pricing)[StatusCake Pricing](/compare/statuscake-pricing)[Pingdom Pricing](/compare/pingdom-pricing)[Better Stack Pricing](/compare/better-stack-pricing)[Uptime Kuma Pricing](/compare/uptime-kuma-pricing)[Cronitor Pricing](/compare/cronitor-pricing)[Healthchecks.io Pricing](/compare/healthchecks-pricing)[Hyperping Pricing](/compare/hyperping-pricing)[Pulsetic Pricing](/compare/pulsetic-pricing) 49/mo for 1,000. FourSight's ladder: free for 10, 6/mo for 50, $40/mo for 100, 60/mo for 500+. Hyperping's free tier is bigger; every paid rung is cheaper on FourSight. ## At a glance - 33% less at 50 monitors - ~46% less at 100 monitors - All 8 check types on Growth ## How Hyperping prices Hyperping prices by monitor count in clean flat tiers — the same philosophy FourSight uses, which makes this the rare comparison you can do almost entirely with arithmetic. As published July 2026 (verify with the vendor): Free covers 20 monitors; Essentials is 4/mo (billed yearly) for 50 monitors; Pro is $74/mo for 100; Business is 49/mo for 1,000; Enterprise is custom. Annual billing gives two months free. Credit where due: a 20-monitor free tier is twice FourSight's, and Hyperping's status pages and UI polish are genuinely excellent. The gap is on the paid rungs and in check-type depth — FourSight's Growth tier adds DNS drift detection, RDAP-based domain expiry, and port send-expect checks that Hyperping doesn't go as deep on, at roughly half Pro's price. FourSight's ladder at the same monitor counts: Starter 6/mo for 50 monitors (1-minute checks), Growth $40/mo for 100 (30-second checks, all 8 check types, escalation policies), Pro $80/mo for 250 with SMS included, Scale 60/mo for 500+ with white-label status pages. Annual billing is ≈25% off. ## Where Hyperping pricing wins Where Hyperping's pricing genuinely wins: - The free tier: 20 monitors vs FourSight's 10 — for small setups that never intend to pay, Hyperping covers more at $0. - Very large fleets: Business includes 1,000 monitors, more headroom than Scale's 500+ baseline (compare per-monitor cost at your actual count). - Status-page polish and overall design, if presentation is a top-three criterion for your team. ## Where FourSight pricing wins Where FourSight's ladder wins: - Every paid rung up to 500 monitors: 6 vs 4 at 50, $40 vs $74 at 100, $80 (250 monitors, SMS included) vs $74 (100 monitors). - Check-type depth at the mid tier: DNS drift, RDAP domain expiry, and port send-expect checks ship in Growth. - Quorum-based consensus on every plan — including Free — rather than multi-location checking alone. - Escalation policies at $40/mo instead of a higher tier. ## Price math by scenario Scenario FourSight Hyperping Free tier Free — 10 monitors — 4-region quorum consensus on every check, email alerts, 1 status page, commercial use allowed. Free — 20 monitors — Twice the monitor count (July 2026 — verify with the vendor). Honest point to Hyperping. 50 monitors Starter — 6/mo — 1-minute intervals, Slack + HMAC webhooks, maintenance windows, 2 status pages. Essentials — 4/mo — Billed yearly (July 2026). Same monitor count, 50% more per month. 100 monitors Growth — $40/mo — 30-second intervals, all 8 check types incl. DNS drift, domain expiry & heartbeats, escalation policies, 5 status pages. Pro — $74/mo — Roughly 85% more at the same count (July 2026 — verify with the vendor). Large fleets / agencies Scale — 60/mo, 500+ monitors — 15-second intervals, 25 white-label status pages, SLA guarantee. Business — 49/mo, 1,000 monitors — More monitor headroom for more money — if you genuinely run ~1,000 monitors, price both and compare per-monitor cost. ## Frequently asked questions ### How much does Hyperping cost? As published on hyperping.com/pricing in July 2026 (verify with the vendor): Free for 20 monitors, Essentials 4/mo for 50 monitors, Pro $74/mo for 100, Business 49/mo for 1,000, all billed yearly with 2 months free on annual plans. Enterprise is custom. ### Is FourSight cheaper than Hyperping? At every published paid tier we compared in July 2026, yes: 6 vs 4 at 50 monitors and $40 vs $74 at 100. The one place Hyperping wins on price is the free tier — 20 monitors vs 10 — and possibly at ~1,000 monitors, where its Business plan has more headroom. Verify current figures with the vendor. ### What justifies Hyperping's higher paid tiers? Genuine strengths: polished status pages, a clean UI, and a bigger free tier. Whether that's worth ~50–85% more per month than FourSight's equivalent tiers depends on how much you value design polish versus check-type depth and quorum consensus — the scenario table above gives you the raw numbers. ### Do both include heartbeat/cron monitoring? Yes. Hyperping includes heartbeat checks; FourSight heartbeats (Growth, $40/mo) support 5-field cron expressions with grace periods and miss thresholds, feeding the same escalation policies as uptime incidents. ## Related comparisons - [FourSight vs Hyperping](/compare/hyperping-alternative) - [DNS monitoring](/features/dns-monitoring) - [Domain expiry monitoring](/features/domain-expiry-monitoring) - [Quorum monitoring](/glossary/quorum-monitoring) - [All FourSight comparisons](/compare) - [FourSight pricing](/pricing) ## Explore FourSight - [FourSight home](/) - [Pricing](/pricing) - [FAQ](/faq) - [Monitoring guides](/guides) - [Monitoring glossary](/glossary) - [Compare FourSight](/compare) - [Monitoring for agencies](/solutions/agencies) - [Monitoring for startups](/solutions/startups) - [Migrate from UptimeRobot](/migrate/uptimerobot) - [Migrate from Freshping](/migrate/freshping) - [About FourSight](/about) - [Privacy policy](/privacy) - [Terms of service](/terms) - [Start monitoring free](/auth?signup=true) - [Cron Job & Heartbeat Monitoring](/features/cron-job-monitoring) - [SSL Certificate Monitoring](/features/ssl-monitoring) - [Status Pages](/features/status-pages) - [Domain Expiry Monitoring](/features/domain-expiry-monitoring) - [DNS Monitoring](/features/dns-monitoring) - [Port Monitoring](/features/port-monitoring) - [FourSight vs UptimeRobot](/compare/uptimerobot-alternative) - [FourSight vs StatusCake](/compare/statuscake-alternative) - [FourSight vs Freshping](/compare/freshping-alternative) - [FourSight vs Pingdom](/compare/pingdom-alternative) - [FourSight vs Pulsetic](/compare/pulsetic-alternative) - [FourSight vs Better Stack](/compare/better-stack-alternative) - [FourSight vs Uptime Kuma](/compare/uptime-kuma-alternative) - [FourSight vs Cronitor](/compare/cronitor-alternative) - [FourSight vs Healthchecks.io](/compare/healthchecks-alternative) - [FourSight vs Hyperping](/compare/hyperping-alternative) - [UptimeRobot pricing](/compare/uptimerobot-pricing) - [StatusCake pricing](/compare/statuscake-pricing) - [Pingdom pricing](/compare/pingdom-pricing) - [Better Stack pricing](/compare/better-stack-pricing) - [Uptime Kuma pricing](/compare/uptime-kuma-pricing) - [Cronitor pricing](/compare/cronitor-pricing) - [Healthchecks.io pricing](/compare/healthchecks-pricing) - [Pulsetic pricing](/compare/pulsetic-pricing) [A TetraCore product](https://tetracorehq.com/)