FourSight
    LoginStart free
    Start free
    Hyperping Pricing Comparison

    Hyperping Pricing, Tier by Tier: $24 vs $16 at 50 monitors, $74 vs $40 at 100

    Hyperping's published ladder (July 2026 — verify with the vendor): free for 20 monitors, Essentials at $24/mo for 50, Pro at $74/mo for 100, Business at $249/mo for 1,000. FourSight's ladder: free for 10, $16/mo for 50, $40/mo for 100, $160/mo for 500+. Hyperping's free tier is bigger; every paid rung is cheaper on FourSight.

    33% less at 50 monitors ~46% less at 100 monitors All 8 check types on Growth

    Looking for the feature-by-feature comparison instead? See FourSight vs Hyperping.

    The pricing model

    How Hyperping prices

    Hyperping prices by monitor count in clean flat tiers — the same philosophy FourSight uses, which makes this the rare comparison you can do almost entirely with arithmetic. As published July 2026 (verify with the vendor): Free covers 20 monitors; Essentials is $24/mo (billed yearly) for 50 monitors; Pro is $74/mo for 100; Business is $249/mo for 1,000; Enterprise is custom. Annual billing gives two months free.

    Credit where due: a 20-monitor free tier is twice FourSight's, and Hyperping's status pages and UI polish are genuinely excellent. The gap is on the paid rungs and in check-type depth — FourSight's Growth tier adds DNS drift detection, RDAP-based domain expiry, and port send-expect checks that Hyperping doesn't go as deep on, at roughly half Pro's price.

    FourSight's ladder at the same monitor counts: Starter $16/mo for 50 monitors (1-minute checks), Growth $40/mo for 100 (30-second checks, all 8 check types, escalation policies), Pro $80/mo for 250 with SMS included, Scale $160/mo for 500+ with white-label status pages. Annual billing is ≈25% off.

    Price math, July 2026

    The same shopping list, priced both ways

    Scenario FourSight Hyperping
    Free tier

    Free — 10 monitors

    4-region quorum consensus on every check, email alerts, 1 status page, commercial use allowed.

    Free — 20 monitors

    Twice the monitor count (July 2026 — verify with the vendor). Honest point to Hyperping.
    50 monitors

    Starter — $16/mo

    1-minute intervals, Slack + HMAC webhooks, maintenance windows, 2 status pages.

    Essentials — $24/mo

    Billed yearly (July 2026). Same monitor count, 50% more per month.
    100 monitors

    Growth — $40/mo

    30-second intervals, all 8 check types incl. DNS drift, domain expiry & heartbeats, escalation policies, 5 status pages.

    Pro — $74/mo

    Roughly 85% more at the same count (July 2026 — verify with the vendor).
    Large fleets / agencies

    Scale — $160/mo, 500+ monitors

    15-second intervals, 25 white-label status pages, SLA guarantee.

    Business — $249/mo, 1,000 monitors

    More monitor headroom for more money — if you genuinely run ~1,000 monitors, price both and compare per-monitor cost.

    Hyperping figures from hyperping.com/pricing as published July 2026 — verify with the vendor; annual billing there gives 2 months free. FourSight prices are from our public pricing page (annual billing ≈ 25% off). Full FourSight plan details are on the pricing page.

    Honest take

    Which pricing wins, where

    Pricing pages usually pretend the writer's tool is cheaper in every scenario. Here's the fair version — where Hyperping's pricing is genuinely the better deal, and where FourSight's is.

    Where Hyperping wins

    Where Hyperping's pricing genuinely wins:

    • The free tier: 20 monitors vs FourSight's 10 — for small setups that never intend to pay, Hyperping covers more at $0.
    • Very large fleets: Business includes 1,000 monitors, more headroom than Scale's 500+ baseline (compare per-monitor cost at your actual count).
    • Status-page polish and overall design, if presentation is a top-three criterion for your team.

    Where FourSight wins

    Where FourSight's ladder wins:

    • Every paid rung up to 500 monitors: $16 vs $24 at 50, $40 vs $74 at 100, $80 (250 monitors, SMS included) vs $74 (100 monitors).
    • Check-type depth at the mid tier: DNS drift, RDAP domain expiry, and port send-expect checks ship in Growth.
    • Quorum-based consensus on every plan — including Free — rather than multi-location checking alone.
    • Escalation policies at $40/mo instead of a higher tier.

    FAQ

    Hyperping pricing questions

    How much does Hyperping cost?

    As published on hyperping.com/pricing in July 2026 (verify with the vendor): Free for 20 monitors, Essentials $24/mo for 50 monitors, Pro $74/mo for 100, Business $249/mo for 1,000, all billed yearly with 2 months free on annual plans. Enterprise is custom.

    Is FourSight cheaper than Hyperping?

    At every published paid tier we compared in July 2026, yes: $16 vs $24 at 50 monitors and $40 vs $74 at 100. The one place Hyperping wins on price is the free tier — 20 monitors vs 10 — and possibly at ~1,000 monitors, where its Business plan has more headroom. Verify current figures with the vendor.

    What justifies Hyperping's higher paid tiers?

    Genuine strengths: polished status pages, a clean UI, and a bigger free tier. Whether that's worth ~50–85% more per month than FourSight's equivalent tiers depends on how much you value design polish versus check-type depth and quorum consensus — the scenario table above gives you the raw numbers.

    Do both include heartbeat/cron monitoring?

    Yes. Hyperping includes heartbeat checks; FourSight heartbeats (Growth, $40/mo) support 5-field cron expressions with grace periods and miss thresholds, feeding the same escalation policies as uptime incidents.

    More price math

    Other pricing comparisons

    Or read the full FourSight vs Hyperping comparison — features, migration steps, and when Hyperping is the better choice.

    Run the numbers on your own monitors

    Start on the Free plan — 10 monitors, 4-region quorum consensus, commercial use allowed. No credit card.

    49/mo for 1,000. FourSight's ladder: free for 10,
    6/mo for 50, $40/mo for 100,
    60/mo for 500+. Hyperping's free tier is bigger; every paid rung is cheaper on FourSight.

    At a glance

    • 33% less at 50 monitors
    • ~46% less at 100 monitors
    • All 8 check types on Growth

    How Hyperping prices

    Hyperping prices by monitor count in clean flat tiers — the same philosophy FourSight uses, which makes this the rare comparison you can do almost entirely with arithmetic. As published July 2026 (verify with the vendor): Free covers 20 monitors; Essentials is

    4/mo (billed yearly) for 50 monitors; Pro is $74/mo for 100; Business is
    49/mo for 1,000; Enterprise is custom. Annual billing gives two months free.

    Credit where due: a 20-monitor free tier is twice FourSight's, and Hyperping's status pages and UI polish are genuinely excellent. The gap is on the paid rungs and in check-type depth — FourSight's Growth tier adds DNS drift detection, RDAP-based domain expiry, and port send-expect checks that Hyperping doesn't go as deep on, at roughly half Pro's price.

    FourSight's ladder at the same monitor counts: Starter

    6/mo for 50 monitors (1-minute checks), Growth $40/mo for 100 (30-second checks, all 8 check types, escalation policies), Pro $80/mo for 250 with SMS included, Scale
    60/mo for 500+ with white-label status pages. Annual billing is ≈25% off.

    Where Hyperping pricing wins

    Where Hyperping's pricing genuinely wins:

    • The free tier: 20 monitors vs FourSight's 10 — for small setups that never intend to pay, Hyperping covers more at $0.
    • Very large fleets: Business includes 1,000 monitors, more headroom than Scale's 500+ baseline (compare per-monitor cost at your actual count).
    • Status-page polish and overall design, if presentation is a top-three criterion for your team.

    Where FourSight pricing wins

    Where FourSight's ladder wins:

    • Every paid rung up to 500 monitors:
      6 vs
      4 at 50, $40 vs $74 at 100, $80 (250 monitors, SMS included) vs $74 (100 monitors).
    • Check-type depth at the mid tier: DNS drift, RDAP domain expiry, and port send-expect checks ship in Growth.
    • Quorum-based consensus on every plan — including Free — rather than multi-location checking alone.
    • Escalation policies at $40/mo instead of a higher tier.

    Price math by scenario

    Scenario FourSight Hyperping
    Free tier Free — 10 monitors — 4-region quorum consensus on every check, email alerts, 1 status page, commercial use allowed. Free — 20 monitors — Twice the monitor count (July 2026 — verify with the vendor). Honest point to Hyperping.
    50 monitors Starter —
    6/mo — 1-minute intervals, Slack + HMAC webhooks, maintenance windows, 2 status pages.
    		 Essentials — 4/mo — Billed yearly (July 2026). Same monitor count, 50% more per month.
    100 monitors Growth — $40/mo — 30-second intervals, all 8 check types incl. DNS drift, domain expiry & heartbeats, escalation policies, 5 status pages. Pro — $74/mo — Roughly 85% more at the same count (July 2026 — verify with the vendor).
    Large fleets / agencies Scale —
    60/mo, 500+ monitors — 15-second intervals, 25 white-label status pages, SLA guarantee.
    		 Business — 49/mo, 1,000 monitors — More monitor headroom for more money — if you genuinely run ~1,000 monitors, price both and compare per-monitor cost.

    Frequently asked questions

    How much does Hyperping cost?

    As published on hyperping.com/pricing in July 2026 (verify with the vendor): Free for 20 monitors, Essentials

    4/mo for 50 monitors, Pro $74/mo for 100, Business
    49/mo for 1,000, all billed yearly with 2 months free on annual plans. Enterprise is custom.

    Is FourSight cheaper than Hyperping?

    At every published paid tier we compared in July 2026, yes:

    6 vs
    4 at 50 monitors and $40 vs $74 at 100. The one place Hyperping wins on price is the free tier — 20 monitors vs 10 — and possibly at ~1,000 monitors, where its Business plan has more headroom. Verify current figures with the vendor.

    What justifies Hyperping's higher paid tiers?

    Genuine strengths: polished status pages, a clean UI, and a bigger free tier. Whether that's worth ~50–85% more per month than FourSight's equivalent tiers depends on how much you value design polish versus check-type depth and quorum consensus — the scenario table above gives you the raw numbers.

    Do both include heartbeat/cron monitoring?

    Yes. Hyperping includes heartbeat checks; FourSight heartbeats (Growth, $40/mo) support 5-field cron expressions with grace periods and miss thresholds, feeding the same escalation policies as uptime incidents.