FourSight
    LoginSign up
    FourSight vs Uptime Kuma

    Looking for a Uptime Kuma alternative?

    Hosted multi-region monitoring without servers, Docker, or self-host maintenance.

    Why switch?

    FourSight vs Uptime Kuma: the breakdown

    Uptime Kuma is the dominant open-source self-hosted monitoring project on GitHub, with tens of thousands of stars and an active community. For homelabs, learning projects, and engineers who genuinely enjoy running their own infrastructure, it's an excellent piece of software.

    The practical trade-offs of self-hosting are well documented in Uptime Kuma's own issue tracker and community forums: you need a VPS or always-on machine, a way to monitor the monitor itself, TLS certificates, backups, version upgrades, and a plan for the case where your hosting provider has the outage. A single-instance Uptime Kuma also can't deliver multi-region consensus by design.

    FourSight is the hosted alternative for the same workload — multi-region checks from independent infrastructure, quorum consensus, hosted status pages, and zero ops. Many teams keep Kuma running internally for low-level network checks and use FourSight as the external, independent watchdog.

    Advantages

    Why teams choose FourSight over Uptime Kuma

    Multi-region by default — Kuma is single-host

    A self-hosted Kuma instance checks from one network location. FourSight runs every check from 4 global regions with quorum voting, so regional flaps don't page you.

    Nothing to host, patch, or back up

    No Docker, no reverse proxy, no TLS certs to renew, no database to back up. Sign up and add monitors — FourSight handles uptime of the monitor for you.

    Independent of your own infrastructure

    If you self-host Kuma in the same cloud account as your app, an outage in that account can take both down at the same time. FourSight monitors from independent infrastructure.

    Hosted status pages & incident management

    Branded public status pages, severity-tagged incidents, maintenance windows, and team accounts — all hosted, all included from Starter.

    Pricing

    Pricing: FourSight vs Uptime Kuma

    Uptime Kuma is free software, but real cost is a VPS ($5–$20/mo), your time to install, upgrade, and back it up, plus a second monitor to watch the monitor.

    FourSight Free ($0/mo): 10 monitors, multi-region consensus, email alerts, a hosted status page — no server, no maintenance.

    FourSight Starter ($16/mo) and Growth ($40/mo): more monitors, faster intervals, all 7 check types, Slack/webhook/SMS alerts, and incident management — cheaper than building reliable self-hosted monitoring for most teams.

    Feature comparison

    Side-by-side comparison

    Feature FourSight Uptime Kuma
    Hosting & Ops
    Fully hosted (no server needed)
    Multi-region checks
    Quorum-based consensus
    Independent of your infra
    Automatic upgrades & backups
    Monitoring
    HTTP monitoring
    Ping monitoring
    SSL certificate monitoring Growth+
    DNS monitoring Growth+
    Domain expiry tracking Growth+
    Keyword / content checks Growth+
    Port monitoring Growth+
    30-second intervals Growth+
    Alerting
    Email alerts
    Slack alerts Starter+
    Webhook alerts Starter+
    SMS alerts Pro+
    Status Pages
    Hosted public status pages Self-hosted
    Custom CSS Pro+
    Operations
    Incident management Starter+
    Maintenance windows Starter+
    Multi-user organizations Growth+
    Pricing
    Software cost Free–$160/mo Free (open source)
    Real cost $0–$160/mo VPS + ops time

    Honest take

    Who should choose which

    Comparison pages usually pretend the writer's tool wins every scenario. Here's the fair version — when FourSight is the right call, and when Uptime Kuma still is.

    Choose FourSight if…

    Pick FourSight when self-hosting is a liability, not a hobby.

    • You don't want to be paged because the box hosting your monitor went down.
    • You need monitoring that's independent of your own cloud account or region.
    • Multi-region quorum consensus is required and a single-instance Kuma can't provide it.
    • Your time is better spent on the product than on Kuma upgrades and backups.

    Choose Uptime Kuma if…

    Uptime Kuma is still a great choice in specific contexts.

    • You're running a homelab or learning project where ops work is the point.
    • You need to monitor internal-only endpoints that aren't reachable from the public internet.
    • Compliance or data-residency rules require monitoring to stay inside your own infrastructure.
    • Software cost matters more than the hidden ops cost of running it.

    Migration

    How to migrate from Uptime Kuma to FourSight

    Kuma stores monitors in SQLite, so the export is fast — the harder question is what you want to keep self-hosting and what you want offloaded.

    Estimated time: 20–30 minutes
    1. 1

      Export Kuma monitors

      From Settings → Backup, export the JSON snapshot. It contains every monitor's URL, type, interval, and notification config.

    2. 2

      Decide what stays in Kuma

      Many teams keep Kuma for internal-only network checks (databases, internal APIs) and use FourSight for everything internet-facing.

    3. 3

      Recreate external-facing monitors in FourSight

      Use the matching check type. FourSight's Free plan handles 10 monitors with multi-region consensus, which is plenty to start.

    4. 4

      Switch external alerting to FourSight

      Point Slack/webhook/SMS at FourSight. Keep Kuma's alerts for internal-only network signals.

    5. 5

      Run as a watchdog pair

      Kuma watches your internals, FourSight watches Kuma's host and your public surfaces. The two together cover failure modes that neither catches alone.

    FAQ

    Common questions

    Why move from Uptime Kuma to a hosted service?

    Self-hosted monitors share fate with your infrastructure — if your VPS or cloud region goes down, the monitor can go down with it. A hosted service like FourSight runs independently and checks from multiple regions.

    Can I keep Uptime Kuma and use FourSight too?

    Yes — many teams run Kuma internally and use FourSight as the external, multi-region watchdog. FourSight's free tier is designed for exactly this.

    How do I migrate from Uptime Kuma?

    Export your monitor list from Kuma (URL, type, interval) and recreate them in FourSight. The Free plan covers 10 monitors with multi-region consensus out of the box.

    Can FourSight monitor my internal network?

    FourSight probes from public regions, so it can only reach internet-routable endpoints. For internal-only checks, keep Uptime Kuma (or another internal agent) running inside your network and have FourSight monitor Kuma's status page as the bridge.

    What's the real cost of self-hosting Kuma?

    A small VPS is $5–$20/mo, plus your time for upgrades, TLS, backups, and a second monitor to watch the box. For commercial use that's often more expensive than FourSight Starter once you cost in time honestly.

    Will my Kuma data import into FourSight?

    Monitor definitions can be recreated quickly from the Kuma backup JSON. Historical uptime data does not import — most teams keep Kuma running read-only for a transition period if they need history for SLA reporting.

    Is FourSight as feature-rich as Kuma?

    Different shape. Kuma supports a long list of niche check types; FourSight focuses on the seven most-used types and adds hosted multi-region quorum, status pages, and incident management around them.

    More comparisons

    See how FourSight compares to others

    Further reading

    References & Uptime Kuma reviews

    First-party docs and independent directories so you can verify the comparison above.

    The verdict

    Uptime Kuma is excellent open-source software. FourSight is what you should run instead when monitor uptime is more important than the satisfaction of self-hosting it.

    Ready to switch from Uptime Kuma?

    No credit card required. 10 free monitors. Multi-region consensus from day one.